TES STANDAR DAN TES BUATAN GURU

Authors

  • Mega Ayu Utamima, M. Abdul Rozak, Eka Widyanti Pendidikan Guru Agama Islam, STAI Sangatta

Keywords:

Standardized tests, teacher-made tests, evaluation, learning, Islamic education

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know more about standardized tests and teacher-made tests, understand the uses and differences that exist in standardized tests and teacher-made tests. the research approach uses a qualitative descriptive method. reducing and summarizing data, presenting findings, and drawing conclusions are part of the process of analyzing data. using trigulation of data sources to inform the truth of the information collected. getting good knowledge about standardized tests and teacher-made tests is a clear result of this research.

References

Azzahro, Tifani Arum, and Fitrianto Eko Subekti. “Systematic Literature Review : Efektivitas Penggunaan Media Evaluasi Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika.” Biormatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan 8, no. 2 (2022): 207–13. https://doi.org/10.35569/biormatika.v8i2.1331.

Fadli, Muhammad Rijal. “Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.” Humanika 21, no. 1 (2021): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075.

Hermawan, Reza. “Vocational Education National Seminar ( VENS ) Analisis Kualitatif Instrumen Tes Buatan Guru SMK Bidang Keahlian Teknik Mekanik Industri,” 2023, 51–54.

Mulyana, Deden, Ahmad Sukandar, and Marwan Setiawan. “Stategi Pembelajaran Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Dalam Meningkatkan Akhlakul Karimah Peserta Didik Di SMA IT Mekarjaya Garut.” Edunity : Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 1, no. 02 (2022): 49–54. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v1i02.8.

Narassati, Ninda Ayu, Rosmawita Saleh, and Riyan Arthur. “Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Berbasis Hots Menggunakan Aplikasi Quizizz Pada Mata Pelajaran Mekanika Teknik Dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh.” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Sipil 3, no. 2 (2021): 169–80. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpts.v3i2.43919.

Nisrokha. “Tes Terstandarisasi.” Jurnal Madaniyah 10, no. 1 (2020): 15–36.

Pratama, Dinar. “Analisis Kualitas Tes Buatan Guru Melalui Pendekatan Item Response Theory (IRT) Model Rasch.” Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 7, no. 1 (2020): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v7i1.1187.

Putri, Ellen Sutopo, and Rinaningsih Rinaningsih. “Review: Tes Diagnostik Sebagai Tes Formatif Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia.” UNESA Journal of Chemical Education 10, no. 1 (2021): 20–27. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v10n1.p20-27.

Rahmasari, Utami Dewi, Akhmad Nugraha, and Dindin Abdul Muiz Lidinillah. “Persepsi Guru Mengenai Pentingnya Kemampuan Mengembangkan Soal Tes Berbasis Literasi Dan Numerasi Di Sekolah Dasar.” Journal of Elementary Education 5, no. 6 (2022): 1105–12.

Setiyowati, Ning. “Penerapan Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.” Js (Jurnal Sekolah) 6, no. 4 (2022): 86. https://doi.org/10.24114/js.v6i4.38662.

Supianto, Supianto, Sri Marmoah, Jenny Indrastoeti Siti Poerwanti, Sukarno Sukarno, Siti Istiyati, and Hasan Mahfud. “Workshop Peyusunan Instrumen Tes Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar.” Adimas : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 7, no. 2 (2023): 117–24. https://doi.org/10.24269/adi.v7i2.7323.

Viera Rahmaniasan, Liska Berlian, and Dwi Indah Suryani. “Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Two-Tier Multiple Choice Berbasis HOTS Tema Pemanfaatan Gelombang Untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa.” Jurnal Pendidikan Mipa 12, no. 3 (2022): 929–35. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i3.706.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28